[Bug 624179] Review Request: zathura - A lightweight PDF viewer

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=624179

--- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> 2010-08-14 15:12:30 EDT ---
OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines
OK - Spec file matches base package name. 
OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. 
OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. 
OK - License (zlib)
OK - License field in spec matches
OK - License file included in package
OK - Spec in American English
OK - Spec is legible.
OK - Sources match upstream md5sum:
67351e5ab66cfdda9a71c9ce6c47a970  zathura-0.0.8.1.tar.gz
67351e5ab66cfdda9a71c9ce6c47a970  zathura-0.0.8.1.tar.gz.orig

OK - BuildRequires correct
OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. 
OK - Package has a correct %clean section. 
OK - Package has correct buildroot
OK - Package is code or permissible content. 
OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. 
OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install

See below - Package is a GUI app and has a .desktop file

OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. 
OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. 
OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. 
OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. 
OK - Package obey's FHS standard (except for 2 exceptions)
See below - No rpmlint output. 
OK - final provides and requires are sane.

SHOULD Items:

OK - Should build in mock. 
OK - Should build on all supported archs
OK - Should function as described. 
OK - Should have dist tag
OK - Should package latest version
OK - Should not use file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or
/usr/sbin

Issues: 

1. This is a GUI app, can you make a desktop file for it so it can be seen/used
from menus? (Might contribute anything you make upstream too)

2. It doesn't look like it's obeying the standard fedora CFLAGS here. 
This should be fixed because we use some of them to provide additional
security. 

Something like a 'export CFLAGS=%{optflags}' before make might work. 

3. rpmlint says: 
zathura-debuginfo.x86_64: E: empty-debuginfo-package
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings.

The debuginfo issue is likely due to wrong cflags or the Makefile calling
strip.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]