Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=624179 --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> 2010-08-14 15:12:30 EDT --- OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License (zlib) OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: 67351e5ab66cfdda9a71c9ce6c47a970 zathura-0.0.8.1.tar.gz 67351e5ab66cfdda9a71c9ce6c47a970 zathura-0.0.8.1.tar.gz.orig OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install See below - Package is a GUI app and has a .desktop file OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - Package obey's FHS standard (except for 2 exceptions) See below - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane. SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. OK - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should function as described. OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version OK - Should not use file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin Issues: 1. This is a GUI app, can you make a desktop file for it so it can be seen/used from menus? (Might contribute anything you make upstream too) 2. It doesn't look like it's obeying the standard fedora CFLAGS here. This should be fixed because we use some of them to provide additional security. Something like a 'export CFLAGS=%{optflags}' before make might work. 3. rpmlint says: zathura-debuginfo.x86_64: E: empty-debuginfo-package 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. The debuginfo issue is likely due to wrong cflags or the Makefile calling strip. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review