[Bug 624179] Review Request: zathura - A lightweight PDF viewer

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=624179

d. johnson <drjohnson1@xxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |drjohnson1@xxxxxxxxx

--- Comment #3 from d. johnson <drjohnson1@xxxxxxxxx> 2010-08-13 20:47:32 EDT ---
Not an official reviewer.

% rpmlint zathura-*
zathura-debuginfo.i686: E: empty-debuginfo-package
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings.

- Package meets naming and packaging guidelines
- Spec file matches base package name.
- Spec has consistent macro usage.
- Meets Packaging Guidelines.
- License - BSD-like, but does not match
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BSD_licenses
- License field in spec matches (BSD)
- License file included in package
- Spec in American English
- Spec is legible.
- Sources match upstream md5sum:

- BuildRequires correct
- Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good.
- Package has a correct %clean section.
- Package has correct buildroot
%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
- Package is code or permissible content.
- Packages %doc files don't affect runtime.

- Headers/static libs in -devel subpackage.
- .la files are removed.

- Package compiles and builds on at least one arch.
- Package has no duplicate files in %files.
- Package doesn't own any directories other packages own.
- Package owns all the directories it creates.
- No rpmlint output. (see above)
- final provides and requires are sane:
(include output of for i in *rpm; do echo $i; rpm -qp --provides $i; echo =;
rpm -qp --requires $i; echo; done
manually indented after checking each line.  I also remove the rpmlib junk and
anything provided by glibc.)

libatk-1.0.so.0  
libcairo.so.2  
libfontconfig.so.1  
libfreetype.so.6  
libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0  
libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0  
libgio-2.0.so.0  
libglib-2.0.so.0  
libgmodule-2.0.so.0  
libgobject-2.0.so.0  
libgthread-2.0.so.0  
libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0  
libm.so.6  
libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.0)  
libpango-1.0.so.0  
libpangocairo-1.0.so.0  
libpangoft2-1.0.so.0  
libpoppler-glib.so.4

SHOULD Items:

- Should build in mock. (Does)
- Should build on all supported archs (Does)
- Should function as described.
- Should have sane scriptlets. (None)
- Should have subpackages require base package with fully versioned depend.
(None)
- Should have dist tag (Does)
- Should package latest version
- check for outstanding bugs on package. (For core merge reviews)

Issues:

1. License needs verification from author.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]