Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=622979 Jaroslav Reznik <jreznik@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Jaroslav Reznik <jreznik@xxxxxxxxxx> 2010-08-11 10:58:07 EDT --- Name: ok, compatibility library Spec: ok Summary: ok License: ok, LGPLv2+ and GPLv3+ Sources: ok c2db0974fcce4401f48f3fa41c4edc5a libassuan-1.0.5.tar.bz2 167c1838f56f3b85083422668b369f17 libassuan-1.0.5.tar.bz2.sig Group: ok BuildRoot: ok Description: ok Macros usage: ok %doc: ok Static only library, it's ok to include in -devel, correct -static provides. No .la files included. Build: local x86_64, Koji Rpmlint: ok libassuan1-devel.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided libassuan-static > ok as it obsoletes < 1.0.3 and provides libassuan1 libassuan1-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary libassuan1-config 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review