Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=621416 --- Comment #8 from Martin Gieseking <martin.gieseking@xxxxxx> 2010-08-11 03:16:31 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > The manpages in an rpm-package don't have to be compressed? Sorry if my previous comments were a bit unclear. You should not compress the manpages manually (e.g. by calling gzip in the spec file) because rpmbuild compresses them automatically when building the binary packages. Since the doxygen generated manpages contain the API docs, they belong to section 3. Thus, the filename suffix should be 3 too. You can accomplish that by adding sed -i '/^MAN_EXTENSION/d' docs/Doxyfile before "make docs" for example. However, there's already a manpage index.3 documenting the string functions index and rindex, so you would get a clash here. I'm not sure how to deal with it. I would either prefix the filename or completely remove the manpages and go with the more comprehensive html docs. > I guess, I can drop -r from the rm -rf, that only removes a single file, can I? Yes, you can. :) The package doesn't build at the moment because the .la file is still present but not packaged. Remove it with rm -f %{buildroot}/%{_libdir}/*.la -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review