Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=615153 --- Comment #7 from Ankur Sinha <sanjay.ankur@xxxxxxxxx> 2010-08-07 10:12:17 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #5) > > Hello Ankur: > > > Yes. I think that would be better. > > Well...I'm not sure right now if it is better to package them separately, > because this version of tint2 has a config tool, called tint2conf, which once > opened it uses tintwizard.py to configure the theme. > You can package them separately, and add a dependancy on tintwizard in the tint package? That way, tint2 will install tintwizard as a separate package on installation. It's not advised to package two different programs into one package, even if they're only used for each other. An illustration: What if tintwizard has a new release, but tint doesn't? You'll have to push an update for the tint package as a whole ( a larger update for nuts ). > But coming back to the license issue...is it not allowed to use a combination > of 2 licenses in a single package? Could you please clarify this to me? Because > in [1] says we can. If this is the case, I can package tint2 and tintwizard.py > together without any problem. > > [1]https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#Multiple_Licensing_Scenarios Yes, you can have multiple Licenses. Since I'm still for two separate packages, this isn't relevant here. > > > It still shouldn't call it a binary AFAIK. It's a python script. Although I may > > be wrong. I'd suggest asking upstream to make up a man page for tintwizard and > > include it in the distribution too. > > Certainly I could suggest upstream to add a man page for tintwizard.py, but I > don't think it is essential here because it is only a warning and to write a > man page could take a long time... > > Ankur, again many thanks for your time, and I would like you to clarify my > doubts in order to go on with this package. > > Regards, > German. A man page is suggested, you can always add it later and push an update. Please do request upstream to get started on it though. regards, Ankur -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review