Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=617524 --- Comment #6 from Paul Howarth <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2010-08-06 11:01:22 EDT --- It wasn't too hard to get these to build with libtidyp. I built the packages with libtidy, tweaked them to use libtidyp instead and put the results here: http://www.city-fan.org/~paul/extras/tidyp/tidy-dependents/ I didn't do perl-HTML-Tidy as the current upstream version of that *requires* libtidyp and won't work with plain libtidy because it accesses a library version number API that libtidy doesn't have. I'd describe the tweaks for building with libtidyp as proof-of-concept rather than something that could go upstream as I imagine the upstreams would want to maintain compatibility with libtidy as well as supporting builds with libtidyp. I've only tested that building works and haven't tested that the packages actually run correctly, except for python-tidy where I first tweaked the package to run its test suite in %check for the original libtidy version and then verified that it still passed after patching to use libtidyp. I've asked for upstream's opinion on migrating all of these packages over to libtidyp but haven't had a response yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review