[Bug 212715] Review Request: openvrml - VRML/X3D runtime library

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: openvrml - VRML/X3D runtime library


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212715





------- Additional Comments From rpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx  2006-11-13 16:51 EST -------
(In reply to comment #9)
> (In reply to comment #6)
> > I'm interested in having this in Extras, too. A few comments:
> > 1. redundant BuildRequires: pkgconfig (required by freetype-devel and
> > libpng-devel), libpng-devel (required by cairo-devel, which is required by
> > gtk2-devel), fontconfig-devel (required by cairo-devel), freetype-devel
> > (required by fontconfig-devel)
> 
> Okay. Presumably making openvrml-devel Require freetype-devel would moot
> Ralf's suggestion that openvrml-devel should Require pkgconfig.

As a result, yes.

> > 2. use BuildRequires: gecko-devel instead of firefox-devel and libGLU-devel
> > instead of mesa-libGLU-devel
> 
> Re: gecko-devel, I don't think I can do that. I think the change that does
> need to be made is for openvrml to Require firefox = 1.5.0.8. Note that
> libopenvrml links with libmozjs, which lives in a versioned subdirectory.
> Consequently, openvrml-devel would Require firefox-devel = 1.5.0.8.

OK, I guess this is moot, because the only package providing gecko-devel is
firefox-devel.

> > 3. reduntant Requires: mesa-libGLU for -gl subpackage
> 
> Why is that redundant?

$ rpm -qpR openvrml-gl-0.16.1-1.x86_64.rpm
...
libGLU.so.1()(64bit)
...
$ rpm -q --whatprovides "libGLU.so.1()(64bit)"
mesa-libGLU-6.5.1-7.fc6.x86_64

That's why.

> > 7. avoid unnecessary docs duplication in every subpackage
> 
> Users shouldn't need to be aware of the package dependency chain in order to 
> find the README or license for the package. Would it be acceptable to install 
> symlinks?

Well, I'll leave that for Ralf to decide. IMHO people are clueful enough to
search in openvrml-%version if they can't find it in
openvrml-mozilla-plugin-%version.

> > 8. rename mozilla-plugin to plugin
> 
> No. There are lots of kinds of plug-ins. This package makes a Mozilla/Gecko 
> one. I might entertain changing it to "gecko-plugin"; but since "Mozilla plug-
> in" or "Netscape plug-in" is what everyone calls these things, that's going to 
> be a tough sell.

OK.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]