[Bug 619395] Review Request: mozc - Opensourced Google Japanese Input

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=619395

--- Comment #3 from Akira TAGOH <tagoh@xxxxxxxxxx> 2010-08-04 11:16:51 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> First of all would you clarify the following?
> 
> ./data/dictionary/README.txt
>   - Well, mozc says the overall license is BSD, however 
>     - this file (./data/dictionary/README.txt) says that 
>       the volaburaly set is taken from ipadic, and 
>       the license of ipadic is not the same as BSD.
>       ! Fedora admits that the license of ipadic is free, 
>         however is different from BSD at least in that the 
>         compatibility with GPL is currently unclear:
>         http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing
> 
>     - Also some other words seems added to the dictionary in the
>       tarball. Maybe newly added words are licensed under BSD,
>       however it seems unclear to me.
> 
>     Would you check under what license the dictionaries in mozc are
>     actually licensed?

Sure. will check it with upstream though, I don't see any issues combining
ipadic's license with BSD.

> ./third_party/rx/v1_0rc2/README
>   - This is under ASL 2.0.
>   ! By the way, there are two third-party products included in mozc
>     tarball (gyp, rx). Generally using bundled libraries is discouraged
>     on Fedora and it is recommended to seperate such bundled libraries
>    
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Bundling_of_multiple_projects
>     Would you create seperated review request for these (if these
>     are really needed)?    

I've submitted a package review for gyp though, there are no upstream for rx
anymore. apparently it may be not supposed to be shipped live for library and a
trivial code though, can't we just have a comment about the license for rx in
the spec file?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]