[Bug 617592] Review Request: libaccounts-qt - Library for handling the account storage

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=617592

--- Comment #7 from Chen Lei <supercyper1@xxxxxxxxx> 2010-08-04 11:10:03 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> I have 0.31 ready to submit, but depends on new libaccounts-glib i submitted
> yesterday.
> Chen, do you minf if i take the chain depends like libaccounts-glib,
> libaccounts-qt, qmf and qt-mobility ?
> []'s    

Feel to add yourself as comaintainer to all my packages listed in pkgdb[1]. For
qmf, we should keep the name messagingframework. Fedora already have a package
named qmf, try "yum info qmf", and meego 1.1 still uses messagingframework as
rpm name.

If you can help to package meego packages, it'll be great.

It seems meego use a forked messagingframework, I wonder if we should use this
forked version instead of the original version maintained by Nokia, what's your
opinion?


[1]https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/users/packages/supercyper

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]