Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=620039 --- Comment #3 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2010-08-03 08:17:28 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > The license for this package is complicated, see image_LICENSE.txt, BSD and > LGPLv3 and Public Domain is not enough(e.g. images from cristalproject is > licensed under LGPLv2+). I've seen that. But AFAIK, LGPLv2+ + LGPLv3 kind of equals LGPLv3. But by all means please correct me if I am wrong > > Doing tests in %check will pull in a lot of other ETS packages, normally I'd > like to do it on a local machine which is already installed the whole ETS > stacks. For no core python packages, I think doing tests is not a good idea, > because most Requires are not listed in BuildRequires. But you can add them as BR, as needed. AFAIK running the embedded tests is encouraged for all software ( unless it is prohibitive or cannot be done in koji) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review