[Bug 566405] Review Request: nmbscan - A NMB/SMB network scanner

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566405

--- Comment #13 from Michal Ambroz <rebus@xxxxxxxxx> 2010-08-03 07:27:53 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> this bug should be closed and a new one should be submitted
> by the new maintainer.    
Hello Manuel, 
I beg to differ - I believe it is better to have it on one place and not split
the effort. There is nothing wrong if package has more than one maintainer. In
fact it is encouraged to be like that to ensure that package gets proper
maintenance in future. 

In Package Review Process
(http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process) there are defined roles,
but it is not said that there can't be more than one maintainer.

In fact in the CVS Admin request you can see even in the example that there
could be more package maintainers from the very beginning. 
(http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_SCM_admin_requests#New_Packages)

Manuel - please could you support your claim by some link to some
procedure/guideline, which says it should be closed and new reopened? 
I have not found it codified anywhete. If it is just your gut feeling, please
reconsider the position.

Best regards
Michal Ambroz

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]