Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firefox-32 - Alternate Launcher for 32bit Firefox https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215256 ------- Additional Comments From wtogami@xxxxxxxxxx 2006-11-13 08:58 EST ------- > Why include Sources as Patches? So it can be tracked in VCS instead of the binary cache. > If there is no way to require the 32bit package from this "wrapper", then the > package seems pretty broken, no? Would "Requires: /usr/lib/mozilla" work? You might be correct, however Bug #214100 is the real reasonable thing to do. Given that has been rejected this package is our only solution until nspluginwrapper is made perfect. > Oh, and Matthias Saou thinks it's pretty weird to address one's self using the > 3rd person :-) That part is actually in the package %description. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review