Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=583531 --- Comment #19 from Kalev Lember <kalev@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2010-07-30 12:53:44 EDT --- (In reply to comment #18) > (In reply to comment #17) > > It would be really nice to have uniform packaging guidelines for Mozilla > > extensions where one could, among other things, get a sample spec file and > > answers to the following questions: > > - how to name the source rpm? > > + we name source rpm according to the spec name. Well, in that case the question is: - how to name the spec file + srpm? > > Hicam, perhaps you could come up with short guidelines and run it through > > Fedora Packaging Committee first? > > This is beyond the scope of this bug, you can open a ticket where appropriate > to discuss that. Adam and you are having a disagreement over the naming here. I'm trying to help you solve the disagreement. One way to do that is for you to come up with short guidelines. You already answered to most of the questions above; copy paste it all together to a wiki page and post it for FPC review. I would be happy to look over the text once you've written a draft. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review