Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=617592 --- Comment #3 from Martin Gieseking <martin.gieseking@xxxxxx> 2010-07-30 10:10:52 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > I suggest to call it accounts-qt I think you meant libaccounts-qt here. In this special case and because of its companion package libaccounts-glib, naming the package libaccounts-qt is probably OK. > libaccounts-qt also provides .qch docs which is used by assitant. Install .qch > files to version doc directories is unacceptable which will break bookmarks > when updating libaccounts-qt. It may be better to simply delete html docs which > provides the same contents with .qch files. > > What's your opinion? I would tend to remove the qch docs and go with html only, as it's the more common format especially for API docs. I don't think most developers would prefer qch over html but might miss the latter. Splitting qch and html docs to different directories is also a bad idea. Thus, I would simply drop the qch file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review