Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474549 --- Comment #29 from Sascha Thomas Spreitzer <sspreitzer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2010-07-30 06:31:06 EDT --- The intention of that paragraph is to keep away lawyers from suing CACert(inc.) in the case, an alien party is appearing fraud/exploitation by CACert root certificates. IMHO it is also stated by the disclaimer, but the CACert community wished to expressively have (no) reliance also included in the license. I inspected about three other CA's licenses, none of those where having a statement of (no) reliance. The CACerts community answer on that was; Of course, they have the money if they run into a suecase, CACert has not. I still have mixed thoughts about RDL, but I am also happy that we finally achieved something that allows the ditribution for alien parties. Even if the license turns out, not to be "free", it still might be compatible and therefor a GOOD marked one, not hindering us from including it into Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review