Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=619518 --- Comment #8 from TK009 <john.brown009@xxxxxxxxx> 2010-07-29 22:02:56 EDT --- I can't give you a good answer as I don't fully understand how those setting work. see: /usr/share/fontconfig/templates/fontconfig-priorities.txt That didn't help me much, neither does the wiki info. What little I do (think I) know is that it sets the priority of the font for the system. 60 would make it a system default if I understand correctly. I set mine to 64 to be safe, your font is a higher quality than mine have been so a higher setting may be appropriate. If you don't have a sponsor you'll want find one. Maybe ask on the devel list. I can't sponsor you as I am only a packager. However, here is what I see for what it is worth. rpmlint: 1 warning aajohan-comfortaa-fonts.noarch: W: no-documentation repo-font-audit 2 warnings 1 Suggestion — Warning: bad font naming Comfortaa, → Comfortaa, Regular Comfortaa Thin.ttf [aajohan-comfortaa-fonts] — Warning: fonts with localized metadata but no English variant /usr/share/fonts/aajohan-comfortaa/Comfortaa Thin.ttf [aajohan-comfortaa-fonts-0:1.4-2.fc13.noarch] — Suggestion: fonts with partial script coverage [aajohan-comfortaa-fonts](3) To get the missing script coverage information simply run FC_DEBUG=256 fc-query <font-file> You'll want to run all three of these yourself and do what the tools suggest. Except for the 60 setting, everything looks pretty good. I do not believe any of these warning would stop the packaging process. You will of course want to address them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review