Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518546 --- Comment #22 from Chen Lei <supercyper1@xxxxxxxxx> 2010-07-27 11:42:41 EDT --- (In reply to comment #21) > We always go with Red Hat / Fedora Legal's take, not what other distros do, so > no, we can't. Still waiting on a legal review of the package without i965 > plugin. > Note that the package is now in RPM Fusion - > https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1321 . > -- > Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers Actually, libva is inclued in all major linux distributions(debian/ubuntu opensuse mandriva gentoo arch) except Fedora. I'll post a request on Legal list for help soon :), this Review Request waits for a legal review for nearly one year. We need this package to be included in fedora not rpmfusion, otherwise we have to miss the whole meego MTF spin in Fedora. Can you help to contact spot or ajax? Is there any other one familiar with libva? Regards, Chen Lei -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review