[Bug 427484] Review Request: publican-RedHat - Red Hat theme

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427484

Paul Howarth <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx

--- Comment #9 from Paul Howarth <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2010-07-26 05:40:19 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> publican-redhat.spec:22: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes
> documentation-devel-%{brand}
> publican-redhat.spec:14: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 14, tab:
> line 5)
> 
> Please fix the mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs.  I don't think the
> unversioned-explicit-obsoletes is an issue. (However, someone correct me if I'm
> wrong).

It's a problem if anyone ever wishes to introduce a package (with any version
number) called documentation-devel-%{brand} in the future. It's not unheard of
for packages to be renamed one way and then back to the original name, or
completely new packages to be introduced with names that have been used for
something else in the past, so best practice is to use a versioned obsolete
such as:

Obsoletes: documentation-devel-%{brand} <= V-R

where V-R is the version/release (including the dist tag, if any) of the last
build using the old name.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]