[Bug 616354] Review Request: geronimo-jpa - Java persistence API implementation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=616354

--- Comment #4 from Stanislav Ochotnicky <sochotni@xxxxxxxxxx> 2010-07-26 04:53:56 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> NEEDSWORK: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in
> the review.
> 
> geronimo-jpa.spec:24: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 24, tab:
> line 4)
> -> NEEDSWORK

Fixed

> Notes:
> * You require an explicit jpackage version in the javadoc subpackage, but an
> unversioned in %post and %postun. Wanted behaviour?

Unwanted, fixed.

> * You just re-use the summary as javadoc description. Wouldn't it be nicer to
> say something like "This package contains the API documentation for..."    

Yes but my summary is: "API documentation for %{name}". It's short enough for
summary and descriptive enough for description IMO. I could change this if you
feel strong enough about it :-)

Spec URL: http://sochotni.fedorapeople.org/packages/geronimo-jpa.spec
SRPM URL:
http://sochotni.fedorapeople.org/packages/geronimo-jpa-1.1.1-3.fc13.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]