[Bug 190346] Review Request: vdr-subtitles - DVB subtitles plugin for VDR

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: vdr-subtitles - DVB subtitles plugin for VDR


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190346


kevin@xxxxxxxxx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |kevin@xxxxxxxxx
OtherBugsDependingO|163776                      |163779
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From kevin@xxxxxxxxx  2006-11-11 23:48 EST -------
To add my 2 cents, I also like to have .spec files linked to reviews. 
It does make it easier to see whats going on with a package without 
having to pull down and unpack the src.rpm. 

That said, here's a review of this package: 


OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines
OK - Spec file matches base package name.
OK - Spec has consistant macro usage.
OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines.
OK - License (GPL)
OK - License field in spec matches
OK - License file included in package
OK - Spec in American English
OK - Spec is legible.
OK - Sources match upstream md5sum:
74780f7f296f1feac13f4358b97bd2f3  vdr-subtitles-0.4.0.tgz
74780f7f296f1feac13f4358b97bd2f3  vdr-subtitles-0.4.0.tgz.1

OK - BuildRequires correct
OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good.
OK - Package has a correct %clean section.
OK - Package has correct buildroot
OK - Package is code or permissible content.
OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime.

OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch.
OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files.
OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own.
OK - Package owns all the directories it creates.
OK - No rpmlint output.
OK - final provides and requires are sane:

SHOULD Items:

OK - Should build in mock.
x86_64/i386 - Should build on all supported archs
OK - Should have dist tag
OK - Should package latest version

Issues:

1. The debian patch at:

http://zap.tartarus.org/~ds/debian/dists/unstable/main/source/vdr-plugin-subtitles_0.3.11-1.ds.diff.gz

is old. Looks like there is a 0.4.0 version there now.
Perhaps updating to that will let you remove a sed in there for the version?

I don't see any blockers however, so this package is APPROVED.
Don't forget to close this NEXTRELEASE once it's been imported and built.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]