Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=581220 --- Comment #23 from Kalev Lember <kalev@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2010-07-21 06:59:48 EDT --- I agree with Orcan: qtsinglecoreapplication.h file only contains function prototypes and to use these the program certainly needs to be linked with the actual DSO providing the symbols. (In reply to comment #22) > LIBS *= -lQtSolutions_SingleCoreApplication-2.6 I must say I don't like the symlink name libQtSolutions_SingleCoreApplication-2.6.so, but at least it's consistent with the non-Core library naming and we should follow upstream naming even if we think it's bad. Upstream should really get their act together and name it to something like: libQtSingleCoreApplication.so (symlink) libQtSingleCoreApplication.so.2 (soname) libQtSingleCoreApplication.so.2.6.1 (DSO) instead. Right now the .prf files hide these names from apps which use qmake, but apps which use other build systems need to spell out the whole name (which includes version!) to link with the lib. The way Orcan is proposing the split in comment #22 is in my opinion the best we can do here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review