Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=583327 Mattias Ellert <mattias.ellert@xxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #11 from Mattias Ellert <mattias.ellert@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2010-07-21 02:04:10 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > This library does not have a standalone release by itself. Hence there are no > packages for it. People keep copying its code into their projects. I talked to > a few people on fedora-devel on IRC. They say xulrunner, gnash etc, everybody > is sweeping it under the carpet. We can always switch over if it becomes > available as a package. I understand your point, and I will not block the review waiting for a universalchardet library to appear. As I said in my previous comment, I think the closest thing you could get to an upstream in Fedora is the xulrunner package (since this contains the full code tree from mozilla and not just a copy of this class). So any solution to the problem with bundled universalchardet code should at least involve the xulrunner maintainers. But as I said, I will not block the review over this issue, so ... ... package approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review