Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=601577 Matthias Runge <mrunge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on|601585, 602587 | --- Comment #8 from Matthias Runge <mrunge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2010-07-20 06:44:31 EDT --- Pavel, I have taken the description from original package description mentioning "-lmail". I have uploaded a new version Spec URL: http://www.matthias-runge.de/fedora/liblockfile.spec SRPM URL: http://www.matthias-runge.de/fedora/liblockfile-1.08-3.fc13.src.rpm I've corrected the exlude for -devel package, excluded statically linked lib, removed the dependency to perl packages from review request. [mrunge@mrungexp SPECS]$ rpmlint /home/mrunge/rpmbuild/SRPMS/liblockfile-1.08-3.fc13.src.rpm /home/mrunge/rpmbuild/RPMS/i686/liblockfile-1.08-3.fc13.i686.rpm /home/mrunge/rpmbuild/RPMS/i686/liblockfile-devel-1.08-3.fc13.i686.rpm /home/mrunge/rpmbuild/RPMS/i686/liblockfile-debuginfo-1.08-3.fc13.i686.rpm liblockfile.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) lmail -> mail, email, l mail liblockfile.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US lmail -> mail, email, l mail liblockfile.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US lockfiles -> lock files, lock-files, lockboxes liblockfile.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) lmail -> mail, email, l mail liblockfile.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US lmail -> mail, email, l mail liblockfile.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US lockfiles -> lock files, lock-files, lockboxes liblockfile-devel.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) libs -> lobs, lib, lis liblockfile-devel.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libs -> lobs, lib, lis 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 8 warnings. The included file COPYRIGHT lists the different licenses for both, liblockfile and dotlockfile. Also, I have contacted the original author for explanation. I've changed usage of %{__rm} and rm (and also other commands) to beconsistent without %{__...}. Regarding the name, I'm currently unsure, what to do. This package is an adoption of a debian package, containing both, devel-part and dotlockfile. I think it's really ugly to separate them (because they are maintained both in one tarball). The tarball is named liblockfile, so I would prefer to name the fedora package liblockfile. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review