Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=615128 Parag AN(पराग) <panemade@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Parag AN(पराग) <panemade@xxxxxxxxx> 2010-07-20 05:21:25 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i686). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2330459 + rpmlint output for SRPM and for RPM. cjkuni-uming-fonts.src: W: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install cjkuni-uming-fonts.src: W: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %clean cjkuni-uming-fonts.src: W: no-buildroot-tag cjkuni-uming-fonts.src: W: no-%clean-section cjkuni-uming-fonts.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided cjkuni-fonts-common 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings. ==> Ok for this package + source files match upstream url (sha1sum) d6b11cc84142364c66d17a0f02fdffbc1b98cedf ttf-arphic-uming_0.2.20080216.1.orig.tar.gz d6b11cc84142364c66d17a0f02fdffbc1b98cedf ttf-arphic-uming_0.2.20080216.1.orig.tar.gz.srpm + package meets naming guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + follows fonts packaging guidelines. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review