Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469931 Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo? | --- Comment #39 from Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> 2010-07-19 14:41:27 EDT --- (In reply to comment #38) > Hans, > > I have fixed those issues in these test versions (pre-release): > Spec URL: http://ipmiutil.sourceforge.net/docs/ipmiutil.spec > SRPM URL: http://ipmiutil.sourceforge.net/FILES/ipmiutil-2.6.8-1.src.rpm > Looks good, Approved! If you create a FAS account (if you haven't already), apply for packager group membership and let me know you FAS username then I'll sponsor you and you can move on with the CVS request, and then import and build, etc. > BTW, about rpmlint: > I'm using rpmlint version 0.80. Which version of rpmlint are you using? And > which rpmlint command-line gets the extra detail you showed? Perhaps the extra > detail only shows up from installing the src rpm, since most of my runs would > have been with the binary rpm. I'm using the rpmlint version which comes with F-13: rpmlint-0.97-1.fc13.noarch I'm invoking it like this: rpmlint rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/ipmiutil-* rpmbuild/SRPMS/ipmiutil-2.6.8-1.fc13.src.rpm You can also run rpmlint on an installed package (it will then run another set of tests as when run on source / binary rpms), like this: rpmlint ipmiutil Regards, Hans -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review