Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541524 --- Comment #4 from Mattias Ellert <mattias.ellert@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2010-07-15 14:09:00 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > - Only a2jmidi_bridge.c and j2amidi_bridge.c seems to be GPLv2+, the > rest of the files are GPLv2 - they don't have the "or (at your > option) any later version" in their license text. Using the license > tag GPLv2 seems more appropriate. Looking more closely, the two source files a2jmidi_bridge.c and j2amidi_bridge.c are compiled into their own binaries without being combined with any of the other files, so the a2jmidi_bridge and j2amidi_bridge binaries are in fact GPLv2+. So the License tag should be GPLv2 and GPLv2+. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review