Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=614692 Mattias Ellert <mattias.ellert@xxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |mattias.ellert@xxxxxxxxxxxx Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Mattias Ellert <mattias.ellert@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2010-07-15 05:46:48 EDT --- Fedora Review qtiocompressor 2010-07-15 rpmlint output: $ rpmlint qtiocompressor-2.3.1-1.fc12.src.rpm \ qtiocompressor-2.3.1-1.fc12.x86_64.rpm \ qtiocompressor-devel-2.3.1-1.fc12.x86_64.rpm \ qtiocompressor-debuginfo-2.3.1-1.fc12.x86_64.rpm qtiocompressor.src:46: W: configure-without-libdir-spec 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. OK - the build get the compiler flags from qt-devel + Package is named according to guidelines + Specfile is named after package + The Package license tag (GPLv3 or LGPLv2 with exceptions) is a Fedora approved license + The Package license tag matches the license statements in the sources + The license files are included in the package as %doc: LICENSE.GPL3, LICENSE.LGPL, LGPL_EXCEPTION.txt + The specfile is written in legible English + Source matches upstream: md5sum srpm/qtiocompressor-2.3_1-opensource.tar.gz \ qtiocompressor-2.3_1-opensource.tar.gz 73bbde56cf705602b4f180b379756a40 srpm/qtiocompressor-2.3_1-opensource.tar.gz 73bbde56cf705602b4f180b379756a40 qtiocompressor-2.3_1-opensource.tar.gz + Koji scratch: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2321485 + BuildRequires are sane + No locales + Package calls ldconfig appropriately + No bundled libraries + Package owns directories it creates + No duplicate files + Permissions are sane and %files has %defattr + Specfile uses macros consistently + %doc is not runtime essential + Headers in -devel + No static libraries + .so link in -devel + -devel requires main with fully qualified version + No libtool archives + A repoquery reveals that the /usr/include/QtSolutions directory is already owned by qtlockedfile-devel - but I guess this falls into the category "Multiple packages own files in a common directory but none of them needs to require the others". If there will be many packages putting files there it might be an idea to put this directory in qt-devel. + Installed files have valid UTF-8 filenames Package approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review