Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=611038 Mattias Ellert <mattias.ellert@xxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |mattias.ellert@xxxxxxxxxxxx Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Mattias Ellert <mattias.ellert@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2010-07-15 01:44:45 EDT --- Fedora Review python-anyjson 2010-07-15 rpmlint output: $ rpmlint python-anyjson-0.2.4-1.fc12.noarch.rpm python-anyjson-0.2.4-1.fc12.src.rpm 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. + Package is named according to guidelines + Specfile is named accordingly + The package license tag (BSD) is a Fedora approved license + The package license tag corresponds to the actual license of the sources + License file is included as %doc + Specfile is written in legible English + Source matches upstream: $ md5sum anyjson-0.2.4.tar.gz srpm/anyjson-0.2.4.tar.gz ed707033ad6cee0a44db199c289a4c80 anyjson-0.2.4.tar.gz ed707033ad6cee0a44db199c289a4c80 srpm/anyjson-0.2.4.tar.gz + Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2321200 + BuildRequires are sane + No locales + No shares libraries + No bundled libraries + Package owns directories it creates + No duplicate files + Permissions are sane and %files has %defattr + Specfile uses macros consistently + Contains code + %doc is not runtime essential + No header files + No static libraries + No libtool archives + Package does not own other's directories + Installed files have valid UTF8 filenames Package approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review