Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=614181 Mattias Ellert <mattias.ellert@xxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |mattias.ellert@xxxxxxxxxxxx --- Comment #1 from Mattias Ellert <mattias.ellert@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2010-07-14 07:33:12 EDT --- Fedora Review libguess 2010-07-14 rpmlint output: libguess.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US automata -> automats, automat, automate libguess.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US reentrant -> re entrant, re-entrant, reentrance libguess-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation libguess.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US automata -> automats, automat, automate libguess.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US reentrant -> re entrant, re-entrant, reentrance libguess.src: W: no-buildroot-tag libguess.src: W: invalid-url Source0: libguess-mercurial-20100713.tar.bz2 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 7 warnings. No issues needs fixing + Package named according to guidelines + Specfile named after package + The package license tag (BSD) is a Fedora approved license + The package license tag matches the license in the sources + The license file (COPYING) is included as %doc + Specfile is written in legible English - The information in the specfile is insufficient to recreate the source archive - not possible to validate. Please add as comment the sequence of commands needed to create the source. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Using_Revision_Control + Package builds - koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2318441 + BuildRequires are sane + no locales + Package calls ldconfig appropriately + no bundled libraries + Package own directories it creates The package relies on the autogenerated requires on /usr/bin/pkg-config for the ownership of /usr/lib64/pkgconfig - if this package will be built for EPEL a dependency on pkg-config needs to be added + No duplicate files + Permissions are sane and %files has %defattr + Specfile use macros consistently + Package contains code + %doc is not runtime essential + Header files in -devel + No static libraries + .so symlink in -devel + -devel requires main with fully qualified version + No .la files + Package does not own other's directories + Installed files have valid UTF8 filenames Summary: OK except for the lacking description for recreating the source -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review