[Bug 612023] Review Request: tinycdb - Utility and library for manipulating constant databases

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=612023

Martin Gieseking <martin.gieseking@xxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+

--- Comment #8 from Martin Gieseking <martin.gieseking@xxxxxx> 2010-07-13 12:02:28 EDT ---
The package looks OK now. Since %makeinstall usually should not be used, please
add a short comment telling that it's valid here and works without unwanted
side-effects.
I also recommend to be more specific in the %files section to avoid packaging
of unwanted files in future versions, e.g.
%{_includedir}/*.h instead of %{_includedir}/*

$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-13-x86_64/result/*.rpm
tinycdb.src: W: no-buildroot-tag
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.

If you don't plan to build this package for EPEL, the warning can be ignored.
Otherwise, add a buildroot tag and clean the buildroot in %install.
Additionally, Requires: pkgconfig would be necessary.

---------------------------------
Key:

[+] OK
[.] OK, not applicable
[X] needs work
---------------------------------

[+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}.
[+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines.
[+] MUST: %makeinstall must not be used when make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot}
works.
    - make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} doesn't work
    - %makeinstall has no unwanted side-effects here, and simplifies the
installation process

[+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license.
[+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
[.] MUST: The file containing the text of the license(s) for the package must
be included in %doc.
[+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
[+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
[+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source.
    $ md5sum tinycdb_0.77.tar.gz*
    c00e5fb96c30356ac3b67b2ab5d5641b  tinycdb_0.77.tar.gz
    c00e5fb96c30356ac3b67b2ab5d5641b  tinycdb_0.77.tar.gz.1

[+] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on
at least one primary architecture.
    koji scratch builds:
    F-12: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2316672
    F-13: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2316685

[.] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, ...
[+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires.
[.] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly.
[+] MUST: Packages storing shared library files (not just symlinks) must call
ldconfig in %post and %postun.
[+] MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
[.] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, ...
[+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. 
[+] MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in %files.
[+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly.
[+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros.
[+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content.
[.] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage.
[+] MUST: Files in %doc must not affect the runtime of the application.
[+] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package.
[.] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package.
    - static library removed

[+] MUST: Library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1) must go in a -devel
package.
[+] MUST: devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned
dependency
[+] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives.
[.] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop
file
[+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other
packages.
[+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.

[.] SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) ...
[+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[+] SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all
supported architectures.
[+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. 
[+] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane.
[.] SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base
package using a fully versioned dependency.
[+] SHOULD: pkgconfig(.pc) files should be placed in a -devel pkg. 
[.] SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin,
/usr/bin, or /usr/sbin ...
[+] SHOULD: your package should contain man pages for binaries/scripts.

----------------
Package APPROVED
----------------

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]