Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arpwatch - Network monitoring tools for tracking IP addresses on a network https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213832 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus@xxxxxxx 2006-11-09 15:49 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12) > OK, if README.fedora in %doc would satisfy you I think that Miroslav should add > it. Or arpfetch could be moved to %doc. Both solutions seem right to me. I have a slight personal preference for arpfetch in %doc. > It is post release, I didn't comment on the version but on the release number > (1.1) - two part number shouldn't be used in devel without a reason. Ok, you're right, I misunderstood... > I've actually tested the scriptlets and even if /sbin/service return nonzero > exit code the chkconfig runs OK so the || : is unnecessary. Ok. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review