Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=606498 --- Comment #9 from Jiri Hladky <jhladky@xxxxxxxxxx> 2010-07-10 08:27:38 EDT --- Hi Brice, it would be great if you can fix arch-specific-header-in-/usr/include problem in the upstream. I have checked rpm spec file for python-devel. They deal with this issue in rpm spec file like this: =============================================================== # Make python-devel multilib-ready (bug #192747, #139911) %global _pyconfig32_h pyconfig-32.h %global _pyconfig64_h pyconfig-64.h %ifarch ppc64 s390x x86_64 ia64 alpha sparc64 %global _pyconfig_h %{_pyconfig64_h} %else %global _pyconfig_h %{_pyconfig32_h} %endif mv %{buildroot}%{_includedir}/python%{pybasever}/pyconfig.h \ %{buildroot}%{_includedir}/python%{pybasever}/%{_pyconfig_h} cat > %{buildroot}%{_includedir}/python%{pybasever}/pyconfig.h << EOF #include <bits/wordsize.h> #if __WORDSIZE == 32 #include "%{_pyconfig32_h}" #elif __WORDSIZE == 64 #include "%{_pyconfig64_h}" #else #error "Unknown word size" #endif EOF ============================================================ Steps are: 1) mv pyconfig.h pyconfig-32.h (or pyconfig-64.h on 64-bit platform) 2) Create new pyconfig.h with following content: #include <bits/wordsize.h> #if __WORDSIZE == 32 #include "%{_pyconfig32_h}" #elif __WORDSIZE == 64 #include "%{_pyconfig64_h}" #else #error "Unknown word size" #endif EOF Please let me know if you can implement this in upstream. If yes, I will wait for 1.0.2 or 1.1 release. Should you run into trouble, let me just know and I will implement python's like solution in the hwloc SPEC file. Thanks a lot! Jirka -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review