Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456353 --- Comment #29 from Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxxx> 2010-07-08 22:49:35 EDT --- (In reply to comment #28) > I'll do the changes you asked, but I have two questions: > > > 'nm src/libffado.so' seems to find at least one call to exit() in the area > > where the following symbols are found: > > I know that the exit() symbol is in the library. I just can't find what source > file it originates from. Doesn't the U in > U exit@@GLIBC_2.0 > mean "undefined"? Correct. Undefined, for that .o module. 'U' basically means an external reference that was not found in the source code at compile time. For example, this C file #include <stdlib.h> #include <stdio.h> int foo(int blahbla) { printf("blahblah %d\n", blahbla); return 0; } produces 0000000000000000 T foo U printf thus "U exit@@GLIBC_2.0" is an external reference, and the symbols "close" to it are typically found in the same .o file at link time as the external reference... making that a clue to help you track down the area of code calling exit(3). > > * The following seems to indicate your devel package needs some additional > > Requires: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Requires > > Can you be more specific? > > Thanks. This part: "Typically, the requirements for -devel packages need yet another look. They're not usually picked up automatically by rpm. [...] This means that gtk+-devel should contain Requires: glib-devel libXi-devel libXext-devel libX11-devel" For example, will building libffado applications require libiec61883-devel or libraw1394-devel? ffado.h appears to lack external dependencies, so I am guessing the answer is "no." But I just wanted to check and make sure. If the answer is "no" this item can be crossed off. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review