Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456353 --- Comment #25 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora@xxxxxxxxx> 2010-07-08 00:53:01 EDT --- Thanks! (In reply to comment #24) > > ffado.x86_64: W: no-documentation > > ffado.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ffado-diag > > ffado.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ffado-fireworks-downloader > > ffado.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ffado-mixer > > ffado.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ffado-dbus-server > > ffado.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ffado-bridgeco-downloader > > some documentation would be nice. not even a basic list of "this program does > <this>" exists. > Yeah. I'll do what every good packager should do. Steal it from Deb... uhm, I mean ask upstream. > > > libffado.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libffado.so.2.999.0 exit@xxxxxxxxxxx > > explanation? > I searched for this one but couldn't find the exit() call with a grep. Maybe it gets in via some weird #include. I'll dig further. Let me know if you can find it. > > libffado-devel.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/libffado-devel-2.0.1/tests/dbus_test.py > > libffado-devel.x86_64: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/libffado-devel-2.0.1/tests/dbus_test.py /usr/bin/python > > seems a bit strange as a %doc? What is the best place to put these? Is %{_datadir}/%{name} good? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review