Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602279 --- Comment #17 from Chen Lei <supercyper1@xxxxxxxxx> 2010-07-04 22:53:13 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > Updated: > > http://siddhesh.fedorapeople.org/LibRaw/0.9.1-6/LibRaw.spec > http://siddhesh.fedorapeople.org/LibRaw/0.9.1-6/LibRaw-0.9.1-6.fc14.src.rpm > > (In reply to comment #13) > > > 2. rpmlint LibRaw-0.9.1-5.fc14.src.rpm > > LibRaw.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US dcraw -> draw, craw, d craw > > LibRaw.src: W: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %clean > > LibRaw.src: W: no-%clean-section > > 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. > > > > %clean-section is still needed for F12 and below. > > I intend to package for F-13 or later, so I followed the suggestion in comment > 2 OK, if you intend to package for Fedora, you can remove BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root and rm -rf %{buildroot} as well. > > 6. License: LGPLv2+ with exceptions > > Please explain why you use this license for LibRaw. > > From website, I see the license is LGPLv2+ or CDDL or LibRaw > > > > Please try to contact fedora-legal to add LibRaw license for fedora > > > > See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#Software_License_List > > Fixed this to LGPLv2. I had misread the license table in > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing > > The library is distributed under all those licenses, but the website also > mentions that "You may choose license you like more from these three.". I chose > to go with LGPLv2.1 as a result. LGPLv2.1 is not enough for LibRaw. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#Dual_Licensing_Scenarios -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review