[Bug 611175] Review Request: yash - Yet Another SHell

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=611175

Iain Arnell <iarnell@xxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+

--- Comment #1 from Iain Arnell <iarnell@xxxxxxxxx> 2010-07-04 03:11:09 EDT ---
+ source files match upstream.  
    c05a0bf6a5a6ae0a6c15d1401bcfeeed  yash-2.22b0.tar.gz
    a1be011e63f94f4a2c3df802815b17e5  yash-doc-2.22b0-ja.tar.gz

+ package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
+ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
+ summary is OK.
+ description is OK.
+ dist tag is present.
+ license field matches the actual license.
    GPLv2+

+ license is open source-compatible.
+ upstream license is included as %doc
+ latest version is being packaged.
+ BuildRequires are proper.
+ compiler flags are appropriate.
+ %clean is present.
+ package builds in mock
    http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2293436

+ package installs properly.
+ rpmlint has no significant complaints:
    yash.src: I: checking
    yash.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US zsh -> sh, ssh, ash
    yash.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US redirections ->
redirection, re directions, re-directions
    yash.src: I: checking-url http://yash.sourceforge.jp/ (timeout 10 seconds)
    yash.src:54: W: configure-without-libdir-spec
    yash.src: W: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install
    yash.src: W: no-buildroot-tag
    yash.src: I: checking-url
http://dl.sourceforge.jp/yash/48168/yash-doc-2.22b0-ja.tar.gz (timeout 10
seconds)
    yash.src: I: checking-url
http://dl.sourceforge.jp/yash/48168/yash-2.22b0.tar.gz (timeout 10 seconds)
    yash.x86_64: I: checking
    yash.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US zsh -> sh, ssh, ash
    yash.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US redirections ->
redirection, re directions, re-directions
    yash.x86_64: I: checking-url http://yash.sourceforge.jp/ (timeout 10
seconds)
    yash.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary yash
    yash-debuginfo.x86_64: I: checking
    yash-debuginfo.x86_64: I: checking-url http://yash.sourceforge.jp/ (timeout
10 seconds)
    yash-doc.noarch: I: checking
    yash-doc.noarch: I: checking-url http://yash.sourceforge.jp/ (timeout 10
seconds)
    4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 8 warnings.

+ final provides and requires are sane:
    yash = 2.22-0.1.b0.fc14
    yash(x86-64) = 2.22-0.1.b0.fc14
=
    libc.so.6()(64bit)  
    libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit)  
    libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4)(64bit)  
    libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3)(64bit)  
    libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4)(64bit)  
    libm.so.6()(64bit)  
    libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit)  
    libtinfo.so.5()(64bit)  
    rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
    rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1
    rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
    rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1
    rtld(GNU_HASH)  

+ %check is present and all tests pass.
    Executing(%check): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.5FWdCk
    + umask 022
    + cd /builddir/build/BUILD
    + cd yash-2.22b0
    + unset DISPLAY
    + make test
    make[1]: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/yash-2.22b0/tests'
    gcc -std=c99 -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions
-fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -D
HAVE_CONFIG_H   -o invoke invoke.c -lm -ltinfo
    gcc -std=c99 -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions
-fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -D
HAVE_CONFIG_H   -o resetsig resetsig.c -lm -ltinfo
    make[2]: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/yash-2.22b0'
    make[3]: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/yash-2.22b0/builtins'
    make[3]: Nothing to be done for `all'.
    make[3]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/yash-2.22b0/builtins'
    make[3]: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/yash-2.22b0/lineedit'
    make[3]: Nothing to be done for `all'.
    make[3]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/yash-2.22b0/lineedit'
    make[2]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/yash-2.22b0'
    Testing ../yash for *.tst
    alias.p     ok
    alias.y     ok
    array.y     ok
    builtin.p   ok
    builtin.y   ok
    dirstack.y  ok
    error.p     ok
    error.y     ok
    expand.p    ok
    expand.y    ok
    fnmatch.p   ok
    help.y      ok
    history.y   ok
    input.p     ok
    input.y     ok
    job.p       ok
    job.y       skipped
    lineedit.y  ok
    option.p    ok
    option.y    ok
    parser.p    ok
    parser.y    ok
    path.p      ok
    path.y      ok
    printf.y    ok
    redir.p     ok
    redir.y     ok
    sig.p       ok
    sig.y       ok
    test.y      ok
    variable.p  ok
    variable.y  ok
    All test(s) completed successfully.
    make[1]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/yash-2.22b0/tests'
    + exit 0

+ no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths.
+ owns the directories it creates.
+ doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
+ no duplicates in %files.
+ file permissions are appropriate.
+ no generically named files
+ code, not content.
+ large documentation is in separate -doc sub-package.
+ %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.


The only minor complaint is there's no man page, but it's not a blocker.

APPROVED.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]