[Bug 609728] Review Request: sparsehash - Extremely memory-efficient C++ hash_map implementation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=609728

Andrew Himelstieb <drewhimelstieb@xxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |drewhimelstieb@xxxxxx

--- Comment #2 from Andrew Himelstieb <drewhimelstieb@xxxxxx> 2010-07-01 23:15:04 EDT ---
-Unsponsored reviewer-

[makerpm@localhost SPECS]$ rpmlint -v sparsehash.spec 
sparsehash.spec: I: checking-url
http://google-sparsehash.googlecode.com/files/sparsehash-1.7.tar.gz (timeout 10
seconds)
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

* Compiled and Built successfully on 2.6.33.5-124.fc13.x86_64
* No %find_lang macros (none needed)
* All requirements met in
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ReviewGuidelines

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]