Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=605373 --- Comment #5 from Kevin Kofler <kevin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2010-06-30 18:12:16 EDT --- rpmlint output: qgis.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US geotiff -> geotaxis, geotropism, geothermic qgis.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US plugins -> plug ins, plug-ins, plugging qgis.i686: W: obsolete-not-provided qgis-theme-classic qgis.i686: W: obsolete-not-provided qgis-theme-gis qgis.i686: W: obsolete-not-provided qgis-theme-nkids qgis.i686: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libqgis_core.so.1.4.0 exit@xxxxxxxxx qgis.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US geotiff -> geotaxis, geotropism, geothermic qgis.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US plugins -> plug ins, plug-ins, plugging qgis.src:233: W: macro-in-%changelog %description qgis.src:233: W: macro-in-%changelog %package qgis.src: W: no-buildroot-tag qgis.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US geotiff -> geotaxis, geotropism, geothermic qgis.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US plugins -> plug ins, plug-ins, plugging qgis.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided qgis-theme-classic qgis.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided qgis-theme-gis qgis.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided qgis-theme-nkids qgis.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libqgis_core.so.1.4.0 exit@xxxxxxxxxxx * The "spelling-error" warnings are obviously bogus. * shared-lib-calls-exit is an upstream issue, definitely not relevant for a rereview, but it should be brought to upstream's attention (it's a bad idea to call exit in a library). * The obsolete-not-provided warnings are harmless. You could in principle add Provides for the themes which are there now (qgis-theme-classic, qgis-theme-gis and qgis-theme-default), but IMHO that's not needed, because nobody is going to try to yum install a qgis theme if qgis already ships it and no other package is ever going to Require a qgis theme. * no-buildroot-tag is not an issue for a Fedora (as opposed to EPEL) package. So the rpmlint test passes, I'm going through the remainder of the review checklist next. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review