Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=609320 Ankur Sinha <sanjay.ankur@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Ankur Sinha <sanjay.ankur@xxxxxxxxx> 2010-06-30 03:52:32 EDT --- Hi, (In reply to comment #4) > Should be all here: > > ftp://ftp.rexursive.com/pub/grimmer-proggy-tinysz-fonts/grimmer-proggy-tinysz-fonts.spec > ftp://ftp.rexursive.com/pub/grimmer-proggy-tinysz-fonts/grimmer-proggy-tinysz-fonts-1.0-2.fc13.src.rpm > > rpmlint output: > > [bojan@shrek SPECS]$ rpmlint grimmer-proggy-tinysz-fonts.spec > grimmer-proggy-tinysz-fonts.spec: W: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install > grimmer-proggy-tinysz-fonts.spec: W: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %clean > 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. > > But I guess that should be OK, because it's not longer required. I'm thinking, > maybe we should keep that after all - in case we branch to EPEL etc. It can't > hurt, right? Yeah, it will simply be ignored. Issues are fixed. You're good to go. XXXX APPROVED XXXX Please continue from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a regards, Ankur -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review