Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602279 --- Comment #8 from Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx> 2010-06-29 03:48:09 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > My original intention to name this libraw instead of LibRaw was to maintain > consistency with other libraries being named lib* instead of Lib*. But I guess > I pretty much invented my own packaging guideline there. Correct, your package naming does not comply to the FPG. > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#General_Naming > > says that it should match the upstream tarball name, but also that I should > maintain consistency with other distributions if it has already been packaged > elsewhere. The Debian one is already out: You are misreading the FPB. Debian is irrelevant. Their naming is lower case only and in general is entirely different from Fedora's. > http://packages.debian.org/unstable/main/libraw-dev Note: libraw-dev - Entirely different from Fedora. > Do I still go ahead and try to match the upstream name? Yes, I consider this to be a MUST FIX. If you really want to support "libraw-*" you can add artificial Provides:. But be warned: There are reasons why we use "the tarballs' name". You find yourselves in trouble should some other project release "libraw" packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review