Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=569833 --- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla <limb@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2010-06-28 12:30:02 EDT --- Thanks for looking at this. I've updated to 6.17. WRT .htaccess, I'm just basically trying to stay close to upstream. I've heard a lot from Drupal users on both sides of the issue. WRT the files migrator script, it's in doc because it's only to be run be admins who've read the directions, essentially. It's actually not even really to be run in most cases, simply to be used as a guideline for manual action. I'm actually not entirely sure it's needed here, in a new package. WRT the license, the code doesn't specify, but refers the reader to the LICENSE.TXT, which specifies GPLv2. I could see using GPLv2, but not just GPL. Updated. SPEC: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/drupal6/drupal6.spec SRPM: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/drupal6/drupal6-6.17-1.fc13.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review