Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592074 --- Comment #1 from Pierre-YvesChibon <pingou@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2010-06-28 02:37:09 EDT --- * Latest version packaged 62ffeff7a9739019b3c42e3eab31f1a89a4d102d SparseM_0.85.tar.gz 62ffeff7a9739019b3c42e3eab31f1a89a4d102d ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES/SparseM_0.85.tar.gz * sha1sum are equals * All required Requires are present * All required BuildRequires are present * The macro %check is present * There is 1 %dir %dir is OK * There is 5 %doc * More element than expected in %doc LICENSE ChangeLog * The rpm installed in _libdir * The rpm uses %{_libdir} and is arch * The rpm seems to have the required element in %install * Build properly under 2.6.33.5-124.fc13.x86_64 * rpmlint: 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Scratch build on koji for target f14 * Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2276476 0 free 0 open 3 done 0 failed 2276476 build (dist-f14, R-SparseM-0.85-1.fc12.src.rpm) completed successfully - Build produces quite a number of warnings * %check is present * All checks are passed successfully * License GPLv2+ is compatible with Fedora ! The license file mention different licenses (and provides a incorrect link) I will ask for information regarding the license before approve this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review