Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608141 --- Comment #4 from Kalev Lember <kalev@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2010-06-28 02:04:02 EDT --- If you are talking about gdk-pixbuf2, then I think that package is actually doing a wrong thing. Probably just an oversight, not something deliberate. gdk-pixbuf2 currently has: %files devel %{_datadir}/gtk-doc/html/* ... and no dependency on gtk-doc. What matters for RPM directory handling is that every single directory has to be owned by something. If we put files in %{_datadir}/gtk-doc/html/*, then %{_datadir}/gtk-doc/ and %{_datadir}/gtk-doc/html/ need to be either owned by this package or something that it depends on, otherwise RPM will leave directories behind when it removes this package. In that FPC thread people were suggesting adding these directories to either gnome-filesystem, filesystem, gtk-doc-filesystem, or making every package co-own these directories. Until any of these *filesystem packages are introduced, we have two options: 1) depend on gtk-doc 2) co-own both directories. I think lets leave the gtk-doc dep as it is right now and wait for FPC decision. I'll keep an eye on the discussion and will update the package accordingly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review