Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608206 --- Comment #5 from Chen Lei <supercyper1@xxxxxxxxx> 2010-06-27 07:06:26 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Jussi, thanks for the review. > (In reply to comment #1) > > Some suggests: > > 1.License: (GPLv2 or GPLv3) and GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+ > > -> GPLv3 > > Because license field only applies to binary rpm > It's in summary GPLv3, yes, but I refer to: > See http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/packaging/2010-May/007075.html for more explanation. I think the mainpackage is a pure GPLv3 license, the license for -devel may be a bit complicated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review