[Bug 607342] Review Request: python-markupsafe - A safe escaping library for markup languages like HTML

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607342

Jason Tibbitts <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+

--- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> 2010-06-25 01:30:17 EDT ---
Yep, that builds fine for me.  rpmlint just says:

python-markupsafe.x86_64: W: private-shared-object-provides
   /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/markupsafe/_speedups.so _speedups.so()
  (64bit)
which as far as I know you can't do anything about because we have no
dependency filtering for arch-specific packages.

The only issue I see: perhaps I'm missing something, but does the URL actually
have anything at all to do with this package?  I can't find any mention at all
of this module at http://dev.pocoo.org/.

It's what pypi says, so I'm no going to fret over it, but it seems a bit odd. 
Honestly I'd probably list the pypi page here instead because it at least has
useful information related to the module.

* source files match upstream.  sha256sum:
   d2a1980ea5bae80a999dad6aafe1ad2f0440522630caeecb84ffe061c8054342
   MarkupSafe-0.9.2.tar.gz
* package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* summary is OK.
* description is OK.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is OK.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.
* license text included in package.
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* compiler flags are appropriate.
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64).
* package installs properly.
* debuginfo package looks complete.
* rpmlint has acceptable complaints.
* final provides and requires are sane:
  python3-markupsafe-0.9.2-3.fc14.x86_64.rpm
   _speedups.so()(64bit)  
   python3-markupsafe = 0.9.2-3.fc14
   python3-markupsafe(x86-64) = 0.9.2-3.fc14
  =
   libpython3.1.so.1.0()(64bit)  
   python(abi) = 3.1

  python-markupsafe-0.9.2-3.fc14.x86_64.rpm
   _speedups.so()(64bit)  
   python-markupsafe = 0.9.2-3.fc14
   python-markupsafe(x86-64) = 0.9.2-3.fc14
  =
   libpython2.6.so.1.0()(64bit)  
   python(abi) = 2.6

* %check is present and all tests pass:
   Ran 2 tests in 0.270s
   Ran 2 tests in 0.253s

* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* no generically named files
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
* no headers.
* no pkgconfig files.
* no static libraries.
* no libtool .la files.

APPROVED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]