Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598688 --- Comment #6 from Niels de Vos <ndevos@xxxxxxxxxx> 2010-06-24 12:36:35 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > I recommend that you ask upstream to clarify the license in the source code > header. Until they reply, the license tag should reflect the license header in > the source code: GPL+. I have contacted the author and archivemount-0.6.1.tar.gz has been released to resolve the license issue. It is definitely LGPLv2+. I got a confirmation by email, but that is in German, so I wont share it here. The latest .spec and SRPM can be downloaded here: - http://nixpanic.net/software/packages/archivemount - http://nixpanic.net/software/packages/archivemount/archivemount.spec - http://nixpanic.net/software/packages/archivemount/archivemount-0.6.1-1.fc13.src.rpm $ rpmlint archivemount.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint archivemount-0.6.1-1.fc13.src.rpm archivemount.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) filesystem -> file system, file-system, systematic archivemount.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libarchive -> lib archive, lib-archive, archive archivemount.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US gz -> g, z, gs archivemount.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US bz -> bx, b, z archivemount.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US filesystem -> file system, file-system, systematic 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings. Cheers, Niels -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review