Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=600467 --- Comment #14 from Martin Gieseking <martin.gieseking@xxxxxx> 2010-06-23 14:27:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > AI am not entirely sure that removing the *.la files is correct and I have > contacted the upstream author to verify this doesn't cripple the program. (It > doesn't appear to). Removing the libtool archives isn't harmful at all. They are only used when linking a library with libtool. Alternatively, you could also explicitly link against the corresponding .a or .so files. Once the binary is built, the .la files are not required any longer, especially since Fedora primarily distributes shared libs which are linked via .so files. And the latter are part of the devel package. > I would like to maintain several R packages in Fedora beyond these (including > R-lme4 and R-MCMCglmm) but wanted to focus on these 3 first. Should I offer > more packages too? OK, that's fine. As far as I know, three packages should be enough, but this decision is up to your sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review