Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: svrcore-devel Alias: svrcore-devel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196393 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson@xxxxxxxxxx 2006-11-06 11:51 EST ------- Its a bit of a balancing act here, I suppose... We want FDS in Extras sooner than later, but we can't loosen the guidelines for something just because we really want it. Yes, when upstream ships only a static lib, its not a blocker, but since we *are* upstream, it seems we ought to fix this, not skate around it -- I think the rule is generally meant to apply to situations where the packager has no direct control over what upstream does. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review