Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=569671 --- Comment #14 from Martin Gieseking <martin.gieseking@xxxxxx> 2010-06-21 10:05:28 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > I hope the library function names don't clash with those in libdnet, since > otherwise also this is asking for trouble. As far as I see, there are no symbol naming conflicts. > Upstream should rename the tarball to 'elliptics'. However, until that happens > this review has the wrong name, as per Fedora naming guidelines. The correct > package name would be, of course, dnet. If I understand the naming guidelines correctly, the package name could also be elliptics, since it's the name of the project: "When naming a package, the name should match the upstream tarball or project name from which this software came." But maybe I just didn't get the intended meaning. However, I find it pretty strange to call the project "elliptics" and use "dnet" everywhere else. So, dnet is perhaps indeed the better package name. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review