Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=577152 Chen Lei <supercyper1@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #16 from Chen Lei <supercyper1@xxxxxxxxx> 2010-06-20 07:46:07 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > (In reply to comment #13) > > Group for apoextractor should be Group: System Environment/Libraries, > > Development/Libraries is for -devel only. > I'll change that, thanks. > By the way, do you know of any Fedora guidelines for choosing RPM groups? I > guess there are none, since RPM groups are pretty much obsoleted by comps. NO guideline as I known, but comps can not replace rpm group because most libraries are not registerd in comps. > > I noticed apiextractor rpm for opensuse patched the place of cmake modules from > > %{_libdir}/cmake/ApiExtractor-%{version}/ to %{_libdir}/cmake/ApiExtractor, I' > > not sure if it's needed. > No idea why they would want to do that. CMake searches both directories for > module configuration files, so there is really no advantage using one over > other. > Do you have a link to that opensuse package? No difference between the two places for cmake modules I think, but we still need a convention to treat cmake modules. See http://www.pyside.org/downloads/ http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/cgoncalves:/pyside:/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review